In many parts of North America, there aren’t enough real farmers to fill all the farmers markets that every country hamlet and urban downtown is scrambling to set up these days. As noted the other day, it's a problem that's percolating in Minnesota right now. The Boston Globe recently reported on how the market-farmer shortage is playing out in Massachusetts.
"We don't have enough farmers to go around, so some communities are going without," the story quoted Jeff Cole, executive director of the Massachusetts Federation of Farmers' Markets, as saying. Did Cole mean that some communities are going without farmers markets? Or are “farmers markets” in some communities making do without farmers?
Undoubtedly, managers of some markets, desperate to bring some trendy farmers market vibe to their town, are tempted to fill the gaps with resellers of wholesale produce. Is that happening in Massachusetts? I asked Jeff Cole to expound on the snippet of his comment that was carried in the story in the Globe. In a response by email, Cole said he meant some communities are not able to start markets they want for lack of farmers willing and able to participate. But it is also true that an increasing volume of resold produce is filling the void, Cole acknowledged:
“As far as we know, farmers markets [in Massachusetts] are not operating with ‘pure resellers’ -- folks who are not farmers or bakers, etc. but who simply buy wholesale and sell retail. But over the years there have been a very few attempts by what we call ‘jobbers’ to infiltrate the system. (We do not consider Haymarket in Boston a farmers market. It is purely wholesale to retail with no growers involved.)
“However, there are a number of markets that permit farmers and backyard growers to purchase product from other farmers and sell it at the market. Over the past few years, in response to the pressure, there has been an increase in the percentage of markets that allow this, but we never thought to track this information statistically."
Cole proceeded to outline the Massachusetts Federation of Farmers' Markets' position on reselling:
“Our stance is that each market must make the choice for itself in concert with the participating farmers and the community. We are, however, firm in the belief that transparency to the consumer is the most important factor in this process. Since the standard assumption of a farmers market is that the grower is selling their own product, we encourage large and clear signage for each farm in a farmers market that is selling another farm's product. In FMFM-managed markets (only seven) we in fact require it when the farmers choose to operate in what we term a ‘cooperative sales’ venue. We feel that as long as the consumer is clear about where their food is coming from, and the community supports the market, one system is not ‘better’ than the other.
“Overall, what we promote and believe is proper is ensuring that, through clarity about source of product, the consumer is the decision maker of final resort. In that regard we are supporters of the country of origin labeling requirements (as are most U.S. family farmers) passed by Congress some time ago and for which implementation is being thwarted (or perhaps more accurately Congress is allowing it to be thwarted) by special interest groups, corporate food giants, retail associations, and lobbyists.”
Comments